With so many chequing account options available, choosing the right one for you can be complicated.
What is a chequing account? Most of our day-to-day banking is done through our chequing or savings accounts. Whether it’s ATM transactions, deposits, money transfers or bill payments, you can meet most of your banking needs with a chequing account. Each bank has its services and fees, so you need to evaluate all aspects of the account before signing up and check out the list of the best chequing account offers available today.
It is essential to choose a bank that you have regular access to. If you like to have access to cash often, you don’t want to pay the extra fees for withdrawals at other banks’ ATMs. Consider the location of the bank and the number of ATMs available to consumers, so you don’t have to worry about adding extra fees. If you’re vacationing in nearby cities, ask about the accessibility of ATMs. Even if you don’t always have your bank nearby, it’s important to check the extent of its reach.
What type of chequing account would you like?
Fees are a key consideration when choosing a chequing account. There are many other fees to consider in addition to your regular monthly fee.
Now that you understand what type of account meets your needs, you can start narrowing down your options based on other features:
Choosing a chequing account can be quite daunting as there are so many options available to Canadians. Think of your chequing account as a mobile plan, and only take what you need. Avoid paying fees for transactions that are add-ons, which will become expensive in the long run.
Consider making a list of what is important to you in a chequing account, such as payments, withdrawals, deposits, etc., and plan how many of these transactions you could potentially make in a month. By doing this type of planning, you can see how much you can afford on monthly bank fees and essentially help you make the right choice for yourself.
See the list of the best chequing account offers available today.
Savings are here: